I’m currently working with an organisation that cannot make a decision without consulting EVERYONE. While that’s very frustrating if you’re working with them and trying to get an end result quickly (this client has a deadline of two weeks), what does that actually do to the project? Does the addition of extra people have any benefits to the work being done?
In short, no. It works in the opposite direction.
One of the hardest parts of working in this field of providing high-quality writing for business is that there are some people in business who believe they can write. Designers tell me the same thing. I had one colleague who had designed no less than 50 different versions of a new logo for a client, only for the client to knock every single one of them back based on ‘I don’t like it’ and then scribble something on a Post-It note and ask ‘can you make it look like this?’ A horrible logo ensued.
I often say in my web writing workshops that approval committees are like vampires. They suck the life out of anything that has been written until the only thing that is left is a limp, lifeless web page.
So how do you work in an environment like that – particularly when it’s your reputation on the line? What if the web site doesn’t engage readers, only for the client to blame you, the writer, for not doing their job?
Well, sometimes you just have to work with it. I’m meeting this client this week (the project is now overdue) but I have a clear paper trail of how many times I’ve asked them for sign-off. I have kept copies of EVERYTHING so that I can refer back to Draft 1.1 where we were saying something the complete opposite.
When you’re writing for the web, you’re often educating the people who you are working with. One of those educational points is that not everyone needs to have a say about the web site.